Typz added a comment.
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D50078#1184159, @krasimir wrote:
> Could you clarify how each piece is supposed to be aligned in these examples?
> This is what makes me happy:
>
> // column limit V
> int a = condition1 ? result1
> : conditio2 ? result2
> : loooooooooocondition
> ? result2
> : dition3 ? resul3
> : resul4;
>
>
>
>
> // column limit V
> int a = condition1
> ? loooooresult1
> : conditio2 ? result2
> : result4;
>
It gives the following:
// column limit V
int a = condition1 ? result1
: conditio2 ? result2
: loooooooooocondition
? result2
: dition3 ? resul3
: resul4;
// column limit V
int a = condition1
? loooooresult1
: conditio2 ? result2
: result4;
i.e. the long result is wrapped and gets an extra indentation.
I have tried quite a bit to "fall back" to the old behavior when there is this
kind of wrapping, but this always created other situations which got brocken
because of this: so finally I choose to stay consistent, and apply the same
behavior whenever there are chained conditionals.
> When BreakBeforeTernaryOperators is false:
>
> int a = condition1 ? result1 :
> conditio2 ? result2 :
> ditino3 ? resul3 :
> result4;
This ones is indeed aligned like this.
Repository:
rC Clang
https://reviews.llvm.org/D50078
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
