JonasToth added a comment. Could there even be a false positive? In a sense, the variable is never used, so it does not matter, not?
Am 10.08.2018 um 22:17 schrieb Shuai Wang via Phabricator: > shuaiwang added a comment. > > In https://reviews.llvm.org/D50447#1194967, @JonasToth wrote: > >> Do you think it is a bad idea? If the variable is not used it is ok to >> >> ignore it in this particular circumstance. Other warnings/check should >> deal with such a situation IMHO. >> >> Am 10.08.2018 um 10:29 schrieb Roman Lebedev via Phabricator: >> >>> lebedev.ri added a comment. >>> >>> It seems this ended up silently being a catch-all, with no option to >>> control this behavior, and i don't see any comments discussing this.. >>> >>> Repository: >>> >>> rL LLVM >>> >>> https://reviews.llvm.org/D50447 > > Not sure whether hokein have done that already but I did run through our code > base and AFAICT there's no false negative. > > Repository: > > rL LLVM > > https://reviews.llvm.org/D50447 Repository: rL LLVM https://reviews.llvm.org/D50447 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list firstname.lastname@example.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits