Szelethus added inline comments.
================
Comment at: test/Analysis/cxx-uninitialized-object-inheritance.cpp:802
+struct DynTBase2 {
+ int x; // expected-note{{uninitialized field 'static_cast<struct
DynTDerived2 *>(this->bptr)->DynTBase2::x'}}
+};
----------------
NoQ wrote:
> Mmm, what's the value of casting to derived type and then specifying that we
> access the field of the base type anyway? Isn't `this->bptr->x` exactly what
> the user needs to know(?)
True, but it's a one tough job to write `this->bptr->x` here and also a correct
note message for...
================
Comment at: test/Analysis/cxx-uninitialized-object-inheritance.cpp:805
+struct DynTDerived2 : DynTBase2 {
+ int y; // expected-note{{uninitialized field 'static_cast<struct
DynTDerived2 *>(this->bptr)->y'}}
+};
----------------
...this one. I'll see how I could achieve it without disrupting `FieldNode`'s
interface too much.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D50892
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
