phosek added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D51440#1218859, @mstorsjo wrote:
> I'll see if I can get to looking at that sometime soon. I had this patch > lying around as an attempt to work around the libtool issue in > https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=27866 which doesn't seem to be > going anywhere (and even if it did, it probably takes quite a bit of time > before a new libtool release is made and it gets propagated to most places > where I'd like to use this), and was curious if there was any specific reason > for having this the way it was, or just the usual; historical reasons that it > has started out like this and haven't had a need to change until now. If you > otherwise would happen to be touching the same areas, feel free to pick it up > ;-) otherwise I'll try to look at addressing your points in a few days. I'd be happy to pick this up. I already planned to do more refactoring/cleanup of this part of the driver. @beanz is improving the Darwin toolchain driver to make more like other Clang drivers, so I want to first sync up with him to make sure this is also going to work for them. Repository: rC Clang https://reviews.llvm.org/D51440 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
