joerg added a comment. I find this warning confusing. I find a4 to be perfectly expected. IMO this warning should be applied only, if the effective value of the expression is not the same as in the modulo-n arithmetic. This means that if (-x) is explicitly or implicitly cast to a less wide unsigned type, it should not warn. It would consider a warning for the case of using (-x) if integer promotion rules makes it negative though. The question is, how to best patch around the warning though. What options does MSVC have for that? I.e. what equivalent expressions do not trigger this warning?
https://reviews.llvm.org/D52137 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
