zturner added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D52193#1238923, @aganea wrote:
> The goal of this change is frictionless compilation into VS2017 when using > `clang-cl` as a compiler. We've realized that compiling Clang+LLD with Clang > generates a faster executable that with MSVC (even latest one). > I currently can't see a good way of generating the Visual Studio solution > with CMake, while using Ninja+clang-cl for compilation. They are two > orthogonal configurations. Any suggestions? I don't think this is necessary. I think your updated Matrix is pretty good. I'm surprised to see that Ninja + Clang is slower than Ninja + MSVC. Are you using lld here? Repository: rC Clang https://reviews.llvm.org/D52193 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
