aaron.ballman added a comment. In http://reviews.llvm.org/D15814#317879, @Eugene.Zelenko wrote:
> This seems to me as specific case of Clang-tidy > readability-implicit-bool-cast. May be this check should be entirely moved to > Clang? I think the reason why that is in clang-tidy is because it would be highly chatty and based on user's style preferences. This particular diagnostic has to do with implicit conversions that involve literals requiring conversion to the destination type, which are far less frequent than implicit conversions in general. http://reviews.llvm.org/D15814 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
