alexfh added a comment. > ! In https://reviews.llvm.org/D52334#1242955, @JonasToth wrote: > ... to me it makes sense to have clang-tidy without CSA.
Yep, it seems reasonable. ================ Comment at: test/CMakeLists.txt:69 - clang-tidy - ) -endif() + clang-tidy + ) ---------------- There are some clang-tidy tests for the static analyzer integration (at least test/clang-tidy/static-analyzer.cpp and test/clang-tidy/static-analyzer-config.cpp). I would expect them to start failing when clang-tidy is built without static analyzer. Did you try running all the tests? Repository: rCTE Clang Tools Extra https://reviews.llvm.org/D52334 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
