kadircet added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D52547#1246701, @ilya-biryukov wrote:
> A drive-by comment. > Would it be cleaner to pass this information from clang? Relying on > completion label seems shaky. Actually I also wanted to do that at first, but then wasn't really sure whether we should introduce a new contextkind or not, because it is more about lsp and wasn't sure if it would be widely applicable to have a distinction between file/directory(folder) as a completion context kind. WDYT @sammccall , would introducing a new completion context carry its weight? Repository: rCTE Clang Tools Extra https://reviews.llvm.org/D52547 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
