MaskRay added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D37726#1264233, @rsmith wrote:
> It would be nice to have a flag here that's agnostic to the value supplied to > `-rtlib` or `-stdlib`. Perhaps `-static-rtlib` (for either libgcc or > compiler-rt) and `-static-stdlib` (for either libc++ or libstdc++). (Yes, > it's bad that we use `stdlib` to mean "the C++ standard library", but that is > the status quo.) https://reviews.llvm.org/rC113891 introduced `-stdlib`... yes it would be nice if it were named `-c++stdlib` or `-cxxstdlib`... (I'm not good at naming) We don't need to be 100% compatible with gcc here.. `--push-state` `-Bstatic` `-lc++/-lstdc++` `--pop-state` can also be used. `--pop-state` works with ld.bfd/gold/lld Repository: rL LLVM https://reviews.llvm.org/D37726 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
