mattd added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D54048#1286654, @rjmccall wrote:
> That looks a lot better, thanks. Did you check whether any other tests > needed adjustment? That's not uncommon from this kind of desugaring change. > > If not, LGTM. Thanks again. I ran the typical 'check-all' in my working tree which included clang, clang-extras, compiler-rt, lld. Everything passed as expected. https://reviews.llvm.org/D54048 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
