Eugene.Zelenko added a comment. C++ Core Guidelines also mentioned similar patterns, so may be this check belongs to bugprone module?
================ Comment at: docs/clang-tidy/checks/llvm-problematic-statics.rst:7 + +Looks for functions defined in "public" headers that return the address of a static local. These are not guaranteed to have the addresss across shared libraries and could be problematic for plugins. + ---------------- static local variable? Probably //Looks for// should be replaced with //Detects//. Please also wrap with 80 characters. Repository: rCTE Clang Tools Extra https://reviews.llvm.org/D54222 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
