On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 5:24 PM David Blaikie <dblai...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks!

Thank you for the review feedback, that was a good catch. I've changed
to an assert in r346714.

~Aaron

>
> On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 2:14 PM Aaron Ballman <aa...@aaronballman.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 1:30 PM David Blaikie <dblai...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > The previous code didn't have a conditional for Iter != End - was that a 
>> > bug? Should there be a test case for that bug?
>> >
>> > If that's not an actual change in behavior, could it be an assert instead 
>> > of a condition?
>>
>> I think an assertion would make the most sense. I can't devise a way
>> where there wouldn't be at least a root path and a file name, so
>> skipping over the root component should always be okay. I'll fix that
>> up.
>>
>> ~Aaron
>>
>> >
>> > On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 1:14 PM Aaron Ballman via cfe-commits 
>> > <cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Author: aaronballman
>> >> Date: Tue Nov  6 13:12:44 2018
>> >> New Revision: 346266
>> >>
>> >> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=346266&view=rev
>> >> Log:
>> >> Don't use std::next() on an input iterator; NFC.
>> >>
>> >> Instead, advance the old-fashioned way, as std::next() cannot be used on 
>> >> an input iterator until C++17.
>> >>
>> >> Modified:
>> >>     cfe/trunk/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/SarifDiagnostics.cpp
>> >>
>> >> Modified: cfe/trunk/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/SarifDiagnostics.cpp
>> >> URL: 
>> >> http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/SarifDiagnostics.cpp?rev=346266&r1=346265&r2=346266&view=diff
>> >> ==============================================================================
>> >> --- cfe/trunk/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/SarifDiagnostics.cpp (original)
>> >> +++ cfe/trunk/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/SarifDiagnostics.cpp Tue Nov  6 
>> >> 13:12:44 2018
>> >> @@ -82,25 +82,27 @@ static std::string fileNameToURI(StringR
>> >>      Ret += Twine("/" + Root).str();
>> >>    }
>> >>
>> >> -  // Add the rest of the path components, encoding any reserved 
>> >> characters.
>> >> -  std::for_each(std::next(sys::path::begin(Filename)), 
>> >> sys::path::end(Filename),
>> >> -                [&Ret](StringRef Component) {
>> >> -                  // For reasons unknown to me, we may get a backslash 
>> >> with
>> >> -                  // Windows native paths for the initial backslash 
>> >> following
>> >> -                  // the drive component, which we need to ignore as a 
>> >> URI path
>> >> -                  // part.
>> >> -                  if (Component == "\\")
>> >> -                    return;
>> >> +  auto Iter = sys::path::begin(Filename), End = sys::path::end(Filename);
>> >> +  if (Iter != End) {
>> >> +    // Add the rest of the path components, encoding any reserved 
>> >> characters;
>> >> +    // we skip past the first path component, as it was handled it above.
>> >> +    std::for_each(++Iter, End, [&Ret](StringRef Component) {
>> >> +      // For reasons unknown to me, we may get a backslash with Windows 
>> >> native
>> >> +      // paths for the initial backslash following the drive component, 
>> >> which
>> >> +      // we need to ignore as a URI path part.
>> >> +      if (Component == "\\")
>> >> +        return;
>> >>
>> >> -                  // Add the separator between the previous path part 
>> >> and the
>> >> -                  // one being currently processed.
>> >> -                  Ret += "/";
>> >> +      // Add the separator between the previous path part and the one 
>> >> being
>> >> +      // currently processed.
>> >> +      Ret += "/";
>> >>
>> >> -                  // URI encode the part.
>> >> -                  for (char C : Component) {
>> >> -                    Ret += percentEncodeURICharacter(C);
>> >> -                  }
>> >> -                });
>> >> +      // URI encode the part.
>> >> +      for (char C : Component) {
>> >> +        Ret += percentEncodeURICharacter(C);
>> >> +      }
>> >> +    });
>> >> +  }
>> >>
>> >>    return Ret.str().str();
>> >>  }
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> cfe-commits mailing list
>> >> cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
>> >> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to