alexfh added a comment. Thanks for addressing the comments. However, the main concern is this:
In http://reviews.llvm.org/D16183#326759, @alexfh wrote: > I'm not sure `tooling::Replacement` is the best place to store check name. > Maybe create a separate wrapper class and serialize it instead > (clang-apply-replacements will have to be changed to support this format as > well). This could be `ClangTidyDiagnostic` or just `Diagnostic`, and we could > also store the message and other useful information in it. http://reviews.llvm.org/D16183 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
