NoQ added inline comments.
================
Comment at: lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/CStringChecker.cpp:2317-2320
else if (isCPPStdLibraryFunction(FDecl, "copy"))
evalFunction = &CStringChecker::evalStdCopy;
else if (isCPPStdLibraryFunction(FDecl, "copy_backward"))
evalFunction = &CStringChecker::evalStdCopyBackward;
----------------
Yes, indeed, this patch does [[ https://reviews.llvm.org/D55875#1336686 | break
]] modeling of `std::copy`, because, well, we *did* have explicit modeling of
`std::copy`.
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D55873/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D55873
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
