rsmith accepted this revision. rsmith added a comment. This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
LGTM with `s/ConstantExpr/FullExpr/`. ================ Comment at: clang/lib/AST/Expr.cpp:2550 } + if (ConstantExpr *CE = dyn_cast<ConstantExpr>(E)) { + E = CE->getSubExpr(); ---------------- Does this pass the tests if you use `FullExpr` here instead? I don't think we should be treating `ConstantExpr` and other `FullExpr`s differently. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D55853/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D55853 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits