george.burgess.iv added a comment. Thanks for this!
> Would it make sense to model this as an (optional) extra flag bit for > __builtin_object_size rather than as a new builtin? +1. That way, we could avoid making a `pass_dynamic_object_size` (assuming we wouldn't want to have a different API between that and __builtin_object_size), as well. :) Repository: rC Clang CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D56760/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D56760 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
