ilya-biryukov added a comment. In D57739#1390252 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D57739#1390252>, @sammccall wrote:
> I agree with this concern, and don't think this is an appropriate layer to be > aware of styling or failing on format errors. Can we consider moving the > formatting to clangdserver as originally planned? `clang-format` seems to be somewhat stable, do we actually expect that to be a large problem in practice? On the other side, I can't imagine any clients that don't need formatting? E.g. it's nice when tests give the same results as one would see in the final clangd and tests don't go through `ClangdServer`. Repository: rCTE Clang Tools Extra CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D57739/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D57739 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
