tlively added a comment. In D57874#1389953 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D57874#1389953>, @aheejin wrote:
> Anyway, moved all logic to the driver layer and did this: > > - `-matomics` means `-mthread-model posix` > - `-mthread-model posix` means `-matomics` > - `-pthread` means both `-matomics` and `-mthread-model posix` If you replace "-matomics" with "-mbulk-memory," I plan to duplicate the logic for items 2 and 3 above, but not 1. For bulk memory even more than atomics, there is a legitimate usecase for enabling it even in single threaded contexts (namely getting to use memory.copy and memory.fill). I wonder if consistency with how bulk memory works is a strong enough argument for dropping item 1 for atomics as well. Repository: rC Clang CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D57874/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D57874 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
