hubert.reinterpretcast added a comment. In D57896#1391611 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D57896#1391611>, @zturner wrote:
> Is this actually any better? Whereas before we can’t differentiate type > names and variable names, under this proposal we can’t differentiate type > names and function names. So it seems a bit of “6 of 1, half dozen of > another” Perhaps you mistyped? The proposal does not change the status quo of either type names nor function names. If you mean that we can't differentiate variable names and function names, then it seems worthwhile to point out that the actual letters (not just the case of said letters) matter too. Whereas the guidelines state that types and variables should have names that are nouns, the guidelines state that functions should have names that are verb phrases. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D57896/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D57896 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
