thakis added a comment. In D58157#1395762 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D58157#1395762>, @mehdi_amini wrote:
> In D58157#1395716 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D58157#1395716>, @rnk wrote: > > > I think we have consensus, > > > Based on three comments in a revision? Seems strange to me. > I don't really care about this, so do whatever you want, but I would expect > that "consensus" means an actual wider discussion (i.e. llvm-dev + cfe-dev). Please cite said discussion for when you added this, as requested above. Else, I think this has seen more discussion than the change that is undoing. It also has the support of several folks very actively working on clang and clang-tools-extra. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D58157/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D58157 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
