rengolin added a comment. Herald added a subscriber: jdoerfert. Funny thing is, SVML is also only supported, AFAIK, for Intel. I agree that we should emit errors, but we should also emit a similar error on SVML.
I know it's not entirely relevant to this patch, but we should keep the behaviour consistent on all veclibs. Also, can you add a test for the new error messages, please? The new changes look good to me and don't substantially deviate from the previous, approved, patch, so LGTM after addressing the comments. Thanks! ================ Comment at: lib/Frontend/CompilerInvocation.cpp:678 + else + Diags.Report(diag::err_drv_invalid_value) << A->getAsString(Args) + << Name; ---------------- This is not really invalid value for the flag, it's invalid architecture for the value. I think there's already a string for that somewhere in Clang. Repository: rC Clang CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D53928/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D53928 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list email@example.com https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits