Charusso added a comment. In D57896#1435245 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D57896#1435245>, @lattner wrote:
> FWIW, my suggestion is *not* to expand names like DRE to decl_ref_expr, I > agree that doesn't add clarity to the code. Two possibilities: "dre", or > "decl" which is what I would write today. I totally agree with you, wherever I can I write that out for clarification. Please note that in my example there is two `Expr` and that is why I pointed out we need acronyms so we cannot really use `expr` and acronyms usually capital, that is why we went back to the default CamelCase standard. It was a little brainstorming and ping for you guys because I believe you would put those polls out and create a better code-base. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D57896/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D57896 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
