aemerson added a comment. In D59615#1439153 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D59615#1439153>, @t.p.northover wrote:
> Did you look into a scalar variant of the intrinsic call instead? These > instructions have non-vector variants (e.g. `sqadd s0, s0, s0`), and that's > actually why the intrinsics exist in the first place. It'd be a shame to > always require this extra work. This looks quite involved as the scalar intrinsics have illegal types etc, and at the moment I don't have a lot of time to spend on this, it was just intended as a fix for the unstable tests: http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-cmake-aarch64-lld/builds/6257 Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D59615/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D59615 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
