alexfh added a comment. In D59449#1435836 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D59449#1435836>, @zinovy.nis wrote:
> In D59449#1435032 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D59449#1435032>, @alexfh wrote: > > > How is this functionality different from the clang-tidy-diff.py script with > > the -j option being added in the other patch? > > > It's the same. Why not just use clang-tidy-diff.py? The clang-tidy-diff.py script has a distinct and somewhat self-documenting name and a very specific purpose (find clang-tidy regressions in a patch), while run-clang-tidy.py is more focused on running over larger bodies of code with a purpose of analyzing or cleaning up. Is there any benefit in having all functionality in run-clang-tidy.py? CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D59449/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D59449 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
