hintonda marked an inline comment as done. hintonda added inline comments.
================ Comment at: clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/utils/HeaderFileExtensionsUtils.h:21 -typedef llvm::SmallSet<llvm::StringRef, 5> HeaderFileExtensionsSet; +using HeaderFileExtensionsSet = SmallSet<StringRef, 5>; ---------------- aaron.ballman wrote: > I do not like that we're removing the namespace qualifier here. I would > prefer to leave it as `::llvm::SmallSet<::llvm::StringRef, 5>` if there is a > namespace clash. Other than aesthetics, the reason I don't like the idea of fully scoping these types, at least without a comment, is that the error is triggered by some other code gets included first, and has nothing to do with this code -- there's nothing actually wrong with the original code. So it could/would be confusing for a reader later on wondering why you needed to fully scope these types, and not others. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D60151/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D60151 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list firstname.lastname@example.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits