ebevhan added a comment.

In D57464#1438213 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D57464#1438213>, @Anastasia wrote:

> > I think I would lean towards the latter since it means less fudging around 
> > with a whole bunch of unrelated methods. Do @rjmccall or @rsmith have any 
> > further opinions on this?
>
> Ok, I can change the patch to prototype this approach. I might need some 
> example test cases though.


Alright!

Just to make sure of something here - are you waiting for me to provide some 
example cases? There hasn't been activity here in a while and I was just 
wondering if it was because you were waiting for this.


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D57464/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D57464



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
  • [PATCH] D57464: Generali... Bevin Hansson via Phabricator via cfe-commits

Reply via email to