krytarowski added a comment. In D60728#1469794 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D60728#1469794>, @hans wrote:
> In D60728#1468713 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D60728#1468713>, @krytarowski > wrote: > > > In D60728#1468486 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D60728#1468486>, @hans wrote: > > > > > What's the value in checking in this xfail'ed test without an actual fix > > > for the problem? > > > > > > Raise awareness about the problem. > > > I don't think that works. No one is reading through the test files of the > repository. Well, I think we should treat it from the other side around. Could we please revert it and backport revert to 8.0.1? The author(s) can improve the implementation and get this pr41027 test to check if a new version works. Right now this blocks upgrades on NetBSD as a number of CPUs is affected (but not x86, so it was overlooked before 8.0 by others than @joerg). CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D60728/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D60728 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
