jsji added a comment. Thanks @MaskRay for help fixing and review!
================ Comment at: lib/Headers/ppc_wrappers/mmintrin.h:3 + * + * Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy + * of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal ---------------- MaskRay wrote: > This is not Apache 2. Ah.. This was aligned with other headers .. but forgot to update to Apache 2. @qiucf Please update it to Apache 2 as well. Thanks. ================ Comment at: lib/Headers/ppc_wrappers/mmintrin.h:24 + +/* Implemented from the specification included in the Intel C++ Compiler + User Guide and Reference, version 9.0. */ ---------------- MaskRay wrote: > Is this considered a derivative work of the Intel C++ Compiler? My understanding is that the `User Guide and Reference ` is the `specification` , implementation based on public specification should NOT be considered as `derivative` work. Otherwise, all codes that referenced `User Guide and Reference ` need to be considered derivative work? Repository: rC Clang CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D59924/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D59924 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
