cpplearner added a comment.
(I am ensadc at bugzilla)
Does this cause regression in the following case?
template<int *N>
void f() {
switch (N) case 0:; // should be diagnosed
switch (0) case N:; // should be diagnosed
}
Currently clang diagnoses these `switch` statements even if the template is not
instantiated, GCC does not.
AFAIK both compilers are correct under [temp.res]/8, but clang's current
behavior seems more helpful.
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D61027/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D61027
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
