Anastasia added a comment.

I think potentially reusing OpenCL features is desirable since the device code 
of SYCL is largely OpenCL. However I don't think we are clear enough about the 
overall device compilation flow of SYCL and I can easily suggest a number of 
different approaches including those that don't modify compiler at all. :)  I 
am afraid until we have the big picture clear it will be hard to make any 
sensible decisions.

I have created an issue about it earlier

https://github.com/intel/llvm/issues/59

and I am going to add some more comments there to explain what we should 
elaborate and agree on.

I suggest we finalize the big picture in the following weeks first and then we 
can go ahead with the detailed work in the reviews.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D60455/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D60455



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
  • [PATCH] D60455: [SYC... Anastasia Stulova via Phabricator via cfe-commits

Reply via email to