rjmccall added a comment.

The flip side of that argument is that (1) there aren't very many users right 
now and (2) it's much easier to start conservative and then weaken the rule 
than it will be to strengthen it later.  It really isn't acceptable to just 
turn off access/use-checking for the destructor, so if we get trapped by the 
choice we make here, we'll end up having to either leak or call 
`std::terminate`.


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D61165/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D61165



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to