NoQ added a comment. In D57858#1499414 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D57858#1499414>, @Szelethus wrote:
> Checker options are a different kind of animal entirely. I think we should > definitely let the user fine-tune some modeling checkers, for instance, > `unix.DynamicMemoryModeling:Optimistic`, despite us not really wanting to let > anyone (even developers really) mess around whether > `unix.DynamicMemoryModeling` should be enabled. Hmm, great point! In D57858#1499414 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D57858#1499414>, @Szelethus wrote: > I am not really confident about osx checkers Let's hide `CheckOSObject` and unhide the rest. Hmm, Devin also mentioned that some help texts are also not user-friendly-enough (eg., the localization checker help with `SymRegion`s and stuff), let's also hide this one. In D57858#1499414 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D57858#1499414>, @Szelethus wrote: > I can see valid uses for the rest of the options, but I might not be strict > enough on this I think `debug.AnalysisOrder` options are worth hiding. Let's also hide the `Optimistic` Malloc Checker, it's clearly alpha. Probably hide alpha checker options if we hide alpha checkers (i.e., Clone Checker). Repository: rC Clang CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D61839/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D61839 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
