gribozavr added inline comments.

================
Comment at: clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/modernize/MakeSmartPtrCheck.cpp:302
+      if (const auto *CEArg = dyn_cast<CXXConstructExpr>(Arg)) {
+        // Strip the ediable move constructor, it is presented in C++11/14 
mode.
+        // e.g. Foo(Bar{1, 2}), the Bar init-list constructor is wrapped around
----------------
s/ediable/elidable/

s/presented/present in the AST/


================
Comment at: clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/modernize/MakeSmartPtrCheck.cpp:304
+        // e.g. Foo(Bar{1, 2}), the Bar init-list constructor is wrapped around
+        // an elidable move constructor.
+        if (CEArg->isElidable()) {
----------------
Isn't it the other way round -- the move constructor is around the init-list 
constructor?


================
Comment at: clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/modernize-make-unique.cpp:1
-// RUN: %check_clang_tidy -std=c++14 %s modernize-make-unique %t -- -- -I 
%S/Inputs/modernize-smart-ptr
-// FIXME: Fix the checker to work in C++17 mode.
+// RUN: %check_clang_tidy -std=c++14,c++17 %s modernize-make-unique %t -- -- 
-I %S/Inputs/modernize-smart-ptr
 
----------------
"-std=c++14-or-later" (will also cover c++2a etc.)


================
Comment at: clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/modernize-make-unique.cpp:457
   // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:28: warning: use std::make_unique instead
-  // CHECK-FIXES: std::unique_ptr<J> PJ2 = std::make_unique<J>(E{1, 2}, 1);
+  // CHECK-FIXES: std::unique_ptr<J> PJ2 = std::unique_ptr<J>(new J(E{1, 2}, 
1));
   PJ2.reset(new J(E{1, 2}, 1));
----------------
Why do we print the warning if the fixit is not fixing anything?


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D62736/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D62736



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to