xazax.hun added a comment. The only problem I see with this approach is that it is an all or nothing thing at the moment. Most of the checks in CSA can have false positives and people usually do not want to fail a build due to a false positive finding. This would force the users to do two separate passes with the static analyzer, one with the checks as errors enabled and one with the rest of the checks. The former run should not include any path sensitive checks as they are never free of false positives (due to the infeasible path problem).
Repository: rC Clang CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D62885/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D62885 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
