jfb added a comment. In D62825#1542377 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D62825#1542377>, @rsmith wrote:
> (You might argue that it's ridiculous to require that `nullptr_t` have the > same size and alignment as `void*` but not have the same storage > representation as a null `void*`. I'd agree, and I've raised this in > committee before, but without success) We could open a DR for `bit_cast<void*>(nullptr_t{})`, with proposed resolution that the `void*` returned is a null `void*`. Approaching the same problem from a different angle to confuse the prey. Repository: rC Clang CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D62825/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D62825 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits