jdoerfert added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang/docs/OpenMPSupport.rst:163
++------------------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------+--------------+--------------------------------------------+
+| memory mangagement | allocate directive and allocate clause
| claimed | r355614,r335952 |
++------------------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------+--------------+--------------------------------------------+
----------------
ABataev wrote:
> Done
Here and above, if there are more revisions, please feel free to add them.
================
Comment at: clang/docs/OpenMPSupport.rst:165
++------------------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------+--------------+--------------------------------------------+
+| OMPD | OMPD interfaces
| mostly done | |
++------------------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------+--------------+--------------------------------------------+
----------------
Hahnfeld wrote:
> This is not correct, at least it's not yet upstream.
Is there anything upstreamed? What should I put for status and
revisions/reviews?
================
Comment at: clang/docs/OpenMPSupport.rst:205
++------------------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------+--------------+--------------------------------------------+
+| device extension | clause: device_type
| claimed | |
++------------------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------+--------------+--------------------------------------------+
----------------
ABataev wrote:
> kkwli0 wrote:
> > ABataev wrote:
> > > Can't find this in the standard.
> > Section 2.12.7
> Then it is unclaimed, I think.
The excel sheet did assign some of the claimed tasks to people/companies so I
will keep them claimed for now and we should ask if they are actually being
worked on or not.
================
Comment at: clang/docs/OpenMPSupport.rst:207
++------------------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------+--------------+--------------------------------------------+
+| device extension | clause: in_reduction
| claimed | |
++------------------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------+--------------+--------------------------------------------+
----------------
ABataev wrote:
> Done.
I only found a 2017 patch which I added but is this completely done? The
category suggest this is device related but I did not find device related code.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D64375/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D64375
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
