sammccall accepted this revision. sammccall added inline comments. This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
================ Comment at: clang-tools-extra/docs/clangd/Features.rst:264 +-------------------------------------+------------+----------+ -| Type hierarchy | No | No | +| Type hierarchy | No | Yes | +-------------------------------------+------------+----------+ ---------------- nridge wrote: > Should I perhaps change type hierarchy's entry in the LSP column from "No" to > "Proposed"? I'm not sure what "no" means, if it doesn't mean "proposed". Changing the "no" links to say "proposal" and link to it would be useful, I think. (And we could delete any rows that don't have a proposal) Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D64614/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D64614 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
