ABataev added inline comments.
================
Comment at: test/OpenMP/declare_mapper_codegen.cpp:44-48
+// CK0-DAG: store i8* %0, i8** [[HANDLEADDR:%[^,]+]]
+// CK0-DAG: store i8* %1, i8** [[BPTRADDR:%[^,]+]]
+// CK0-DAG: store i8* %2, i8** [[VPTRADDR:%[^,]+]]
+// CK0-DAG: store i64 %3, i{{64|32}}* [[SIZEADDR:%[^,]+]]
+// CK0-DAG: store i64 %4, i64* [[TYPEADDR:%[^,]+]]
----------------
lildmh wrote:
> ABataev wrote:
> > lildmh wrote:
> > > ABataev wrote:
> > > > I would not rely on the predetermined indices here, better to use some
> > > > kind of patterns here just like in other places.
> > > Could you give an example about what you suggest? For instance, some
> > > other tests I should look into.
> > Just like in this test when you're using vars.
> Sorry I was not clear before. What do you mean by "predetermined indices"
> here? If you are referring to, for example, `%0` in `store i8* %0, i8**
> [[HANDLEADDR:%[^,]+]]`, I guess there is no way to get rid of `%0` because it
> means the first argument of the function?
Yes, I meant those `%0` like registers. Better to mark them as variables in
function declaration and use those names in the checks.
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D59474/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D59474
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
