NoQ added inline comments.
================ Comment at: clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/BugReporterVisitors.cpp:2420 + if (!IsAssuming) { + PathDiagnosticLocation Loc(BExpr->getLHS(), BRC.getSourceManager(), LCtx); return std::make_shared<PathDiagnosticPopUpPiece>(Loc, Message); ---------------- Charusso wrote: > NoQ wrote: > > Just curious, can `BExpr->getLHS()` potentially still be a multi-line > > expression? Or are we making sure it's always a `DeclRefExpr`/`MemberExpr`? > > > > In case of `MemberExpr` i'm pretty sure you can fit a newline before/after > > `.` or `->`. > Previously I have focused on `DeclRefExpr` and `MemberExpr` value-evaluation, > so that there the expression must be one of them. Because we have no > `getField()` method for obtaining the field of the `MemberExpr`, I have > picked `getBase()`. It's `MemberExpr::getMemberLoc()`. It's always a single token. Unlike the base, which may still be arbitrarily complex. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D65663/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D65663 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits