Charusso added a comment. In D64374#1594617 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D64374#1594617>, @Szelethus wrote:
> I guess `getAs` and `castAs` methods could join the party too. I'm evaluating > plenty of results on LLVM, and those seem to be in the same problem category. In D64374#1618694 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D64374#1618694>, @Szelethus wrote: > Do you have plans to extend this checker with the modeling of `isa<>`? I > might take that off your shoulder if not :) Hey! Sorry for the late response, just it is a heavy change. This patch creates about 200 TP, I have checked out every of the new reports. https://reviews.llvm.org/D65889 creates about 400 TP as an estimation, then `isa()` is the next goal. Thanks you for the ideas! CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D64374/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D64374 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
