ZaMaZaN4iK added a comment. > My point regarding statistics is that the check needs to pull its own weight > -- if it doesn't find many true positives, it's not of much value to a broad > community, or if it has a lot of false positives, we may need to tweak the > check before releasing it to the public, etc. So definitely do the > implementation work, but part of that work should be testing it over large > code bases and reporting back the results.
Okay. Do we have any infrastructure for doing such testing? Or I should do it manually: prepare some large codebases, run over them clang-tidy with the check and parse the result? Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D65912/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D65912 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
