MaskRay added a comment. In D65616#1634966 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D65616#1634966>, @serge-sans-paille wrote:
> Adding @hfinkel to the thread to confirm it's okay to add this behavior, as > he authored an RFC on the subject (see > https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-November/107625.html) -fsemantic-interposition was added in GCC 5.1. I don't think lots of projects in the wild are using it. The important D20217 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D20217> has been merged, I think we should actually implement this option instead of ignoring it (I'd be very happy to help this). > that may be used by some gcc users Can you just name the user groups? :) When they write `-fsemantic-interposition`, do they know that current clang doesn't match the GCC behavior? Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D65616/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D65616 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
