lebedev.ri added inline comments.
================ Comment at: clang/test/Profile/misexpect-branch-cold.c:4 +// RUN: llvm-profdata merge %S/Inputs/misexpect-branch.proftext -o %t.profdata +// RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -O2 -o - -disable-llvm-passes -emit-llvm -fprofile-instrument-use-path=%t.profdata -verify -Wmisexpect + ---------------- paulkirth wrote: > lebedev.ri wrote: > > Is there a test where `-Wmisexpect` isn't present, to verify that it is > > off-by-default? > We can add one, but is that necessary? Don't the tests for diagnostics cover > those already? To clarify: i'm interested in the case where the PGO data is provided but `-Wmisexpect` is *not* specified. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D66324/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D66324 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
