Sorry if this is answered in the patches but what happens if a loop has both #pragma clang loop and transform defined before it? I guess it probably shouldn't work.
Perhaps instead you could create a new option to indicate that the order should be respected. #pragma clang loop respect_order <- optionally with (true) or (false) That approach would avoid the inevitable conflicts of having both loop and transform pragmas on the same loop. On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 5:27 PM Michael Kruse via Phabricator < revi...@reviews.llvm.org> wrote: > Meinersbur added a comment. > > In D69088#1713623 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D69088#1713623>, @hsaito > wrote: > > > @Meinersbur, if I remember correctly, there was an RFC discussion on > this topic, right? If yes, would you post the pointer to that? I need a > refresher on what has been discussed/settled in the past. > > > https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2018-May/058141.html > > > Repository: > rC Clang > > CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION > https://reviews.llvm.org/D69088/new/ > > https://reviews.llvm.org/D69088 > > > >
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
