rnk added a comment. In D67723#1710134 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D67723#1710134>, @probinson wrote:
> FTR, since @rnk has mentioned my years-ago writings, what Sony has internally > nowadays is a little different than what I said back then. We have an option > spelled `-gno-inlined-scopes` which is slightly tricky to describe > precisely, but the intent is that for debug-info purposes, certain functions > appear to be empty. That is, the declaration is still emitted (which is > different from `nodebug`) but the generated IR has no source locations. Thanks for the info. That's interesting, and in the end I suppose it's pretty different from the behavior we had in mind for this flag. --- I chatted offline with @dblaikie and he suggested perhaps it would be better to motivate this flag as one of the many existing knobs we have for controlling the volume of debug info produced by the debugger. We already have two major examples of this: - -gline-tables-only / -gmlt / -g1 - -flimit-debug / -fno-standalone-debug This flag exists to give the user the ability to produce even less debug info, if that debug info seems to be putting pressure on the tools downstream: the linker or the debugger. We are motivated by one tool in particular at the moment, but if we're going to take the time to add a knob, we might as well make it work for DWARF. If the user cares enough to find this flag, it seems more user friendly to make it behave the same rather than making it format-dependent. @aprantl hit accept on a previous diff, but Amy changed the line zero behavior after that, so I just wanted to reconfirm that the current behavior is OK. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D67723/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D67723 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
