ymandel added a comment. In D69625#1729702 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D69625#1729702>, @gribozavr2 wrote:
> > Which idiom do you think we should encourage, then, for text and > > range-selectors -- the named combinator or the single-argument cat? That is > > You are making a very interesting point! > > It sounds very appealing to me to remove the special `text` and `selection` > functions in favor of `cat`. Users of the library (both readers and writers) > will have to know about `cat`. So the advantage of having special functions > `text` and `selection` is really limited I think. Are you suggesting we remove `text` and `selection` entirely? I really like this idea, just want to be sure I hadn't read more into your comment than you intended. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D69625/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D69625 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
