jdoerfert marked an inline comment as done. jdoerfert added inline comments.
================ Comment at: clang/lib/Sema/SemaOpenMP.cpp:4011 unsigned NamedModifiersNumber = 0; - SmallVector<const OMPIfClause *, OMPC_unknown + 1> FoundNameModifiers( - OMPD_unknown + 1); + SmallVector<const OMPIfClause *, unsigned(OMPC_unknown) + 1> + FoundNameModifiers(unsigned(OMPD_unknown) + 1); ---------------- ABataev wrote: > JonChesterfield wrote: > > I wonder if it would be worth wrapping the accesses to FoundNameModifiers > > in functor that does the enum class to unsigned conversion. E.g. a class > > instance that contains the small vector and exposes operator[] that takes > > the enum class. > > > > FoundNameModifiers[unsigned(val)] is quite a lot of line noise. > Why `map`? It can be represented as a simple c-style array without any > problems. No, these are not enums that auto-convert to unsigned. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D69853/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D69853 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
