spatel added a comment. In D69979#1740294 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D69979#1740294>, @arsenm wrote:
> In D69979#1738099 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D69979#1738099>, @craig.topper > wrote: > > > I checked Redhat 7.4 that's on the server I'm using for work. And I had a > > coworker check his Ubuntu 18.04 system with this program. And both systems > > printed 1f80 as the value of MXCSR which shows FTZ and DAZ are both 0. Are > > you seeing something different? > > > > #include <x86intrin.h> > > #include <stdio.h> > > > > int main() { > > int csr = _mm_getcsr(); > > printf("%x\n", csr); > > return 0; > > } > > > > > I see the value as 1f80. However the test program I wrote suggests the > default is to flush (and what the comments in bug 34994 suggest?): Is the test program attached somewhere? Bug 34994 (https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34994) was limited to changing cases where we are running in some kind of loose-FP environment (otherwise, we would not be generating a sqrt estimate sequence at all). In the default (IEEE-compliant) environment, x86 would use a full-precision sqrt instruction or make a call to libm sqrt. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D69979/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D69979 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
