annita.zhang added a comment. In D70157#1744243 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D70157#1744243>, @chandlerc wrote:
> Thanks for sending this out! > > I've made a minor comment on the flag structure, but my bigger question would > be: can you summarize the performance hit and code size hit you've seen > across some benchmarks? SPEC and the LLVM test suite would be nice, and maybe > code size alone for some large binary like Chrome, Firefox, or Safari? > > I'd be particularly interested in comparing the performance & code size hit > incurred by the suggested "fused,jcc,jmp" set compared to all (adding call, > ret, and indirect). If there is a big drop in either, I'd love to know which > of these incurs the large drop. > > Thanks, > -Chandler We are working on the performance and code size evaluation. Will update once it's available. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D70157/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D70157 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
